|
So
James wants us to move from being “hearers who forget” to “doers who
act.” It’s a perennial problem, this integrity gap, for all of us,
preachers, lay people, even nations. We hear the gospel, but then
either forget what we’ve heard, or act like we have. Our hearing of
the gospel doesn’t always translate into doing the gospel. In a
Harper’s magazine article, Bill McKibben, takes a shot at this own
nation of the United States. (Sept. 05) It’s not really a “shot”, so
much as an observation that the most Christian nation on earth seems
to be among those whom James had in mind. He begins by pointing out
that his nation is the most spiritually homogeneous nation on earth. A
full 85% of his fellow Americans call themselves Christian. Compare
this with Israel. Only 77% claim to be Jewish. It is a thoroughly
Christian nation. Yet he argues it is the least Christian in terms of
its behaviour.
The statistics he
uses to back up his claims are compelling. In 2004, the U.S. ranked
second last among developed nations in foreign aid; 15 cents a day per
person in foreign aid. You might think, well, the private sector are
making up for it, but in actuality, that increases the amount by a
mere 6 cents. Well, perhaps they’re spending it all on taking care of
their own people. But nearly 18% of American children live in poverty,
compared to 8% in Sweden, a non-Christian country. If Christian
charity is defined as caring for the least and the last, say as
childhood nutrition, infant mortality, access to preschool, his nation
comes in last among developed nations, in every category.
He goes on to
state that despite Jesus’ injunction to turn the other cheek, American
culture is the most violent rich nation on earth, with a murder rate
five times that of Europe, prison populations which are seven times
greater than other developed nations. He is a citizen of the only
Western democracy that still executes its citizens, mostly in states
where Christianity is the strongest.
Now, I realize
that it’s one thing for an American citizen to trot out these
statistics and another thing for a Canuck to bring them up. But I
don’t bring them up to gloat, nor to denigrate American culture. Just
two weeks ago I had the privilege of being visited by a new friend
from Ohio. He is a deeply committed Christian and he expressed the
same concern. He wondered whether his Christian brothers and sisters
were hearing the same gospel that he heard on Sunday mornings. And if
so, why was it being translated into such regressive social policy? I
am also concerned because it is the most powerful nation on earth, and
it seems as the political and Christian right is exerting increasing
influence on us as a nation.
I bring Bill
McKibben’s article up because it so clearly illustrates how easy it is
to confuse the gospel with our dominant cultural narratives. These are
the stories we live by, and they are more often than not unconscious.
They enter us by osmosis. We pick these narratives up simply by virtue
of being a citizen of a culture. This is why, by the way, the Jews
were so careful about setting themselves apart from other cultures.
They knew that a culture’s myth or narrative has a way of getting
inside and taking hold. When Jesus performed his exorcisms, the demons
he cast out were the stories of the surrounding culture which did not
belong in the consciousness of the possessed. In his new book, The
Great Turning, David Korten identifies three cultural narratives which
compete with the gospel for our allegiance, and don’t belong in the
Christian psyche. These are:
1. The Imperial
Prosperity Story: prosperity means perpetually continually
growing our economy which benefits everybody. We need wealthy people
to do this, and that means getting out of their way; remove anything
that gets in the way of creating and accumulating wealth;
environmental standards, taxes, all trade regulations. Eliminate
welfare programs in order to teach the poor about hard work.
2. The Imperial Security
Story: in every nook and cranny terrorists and criminals lurk.
The only way to ensure safety is to divert enormous amounts of money
toward the military, police, and homeland security. As long as you
keep the people frightened, you’ll have all the money you need. The
war against terror, the President warns, is never-ending.
3. The Imperial Meaning
Story: this features a God who rewards righteousness with wealth
and power and mandates that the rich rule over the poor, who get
what they deserve.
Now, you might
say, these aren’t our cultural myths or narratives. We’re
Canadians. But I’m less and less certain. With the convergence of
multimedia conglomerates, this neo-imperial narrative is making
headway all over the world, including Canada.
Precisely because
these conventional stories are unconscious, we pick them up like a bad
virus. We don’t realize that we filter reality through their lens.
Even the gospel gets viewed through this lens. When it does we become
hearers who forget, rather than doers who act. Point me to the precise
place in the New Testament where these stories are endorsed by Jesus.
They’re not there. You’ll find lots about selling your possessions
and giving them to the poor; there’s a story about a rich man who
ends up suffering in hell for not even noticing a poor man outside his
palace when he was living; you’ll find teachings about the foolish man
who had a good crop and so built bigger and bigger barns, so that he
could enjoy the easy life; lots of stuff about not laying up
treasure in other words; plenty of teachings which indicate that the
basis of lasting security is justice for the poor, not bigger and
bigger armies and homeland security; you’ll find in Jesus’ own mission
statement a line about releasing the captives, not building
more prisons for them; you won’t find any support for executing
them. In fact, he becomes a prisoner who gets executed by the
state. Why would Christians want to perpetuate the practice? Not easy
teachings, I grant, and certainly open to interpretation, but they
can’t easily be squared with Korten’s Imperial narratives.
John Crossan has
pointed out that literary forms serve different purposes. The purpose
of myth as a literary form is to create the world; it gives us the
conventional take on what life is about. But the purpose of parable,
Jesus’ preferred mode of teaching, is to explode and undermine myth.
To follow Jesus is to be willing. week after week, to place the TNT of
Jesus’ parables under all our conventional stories about who we are
and what life is for. Nobody said it would be easy. In fact, it’s
impossible. We are forced, day after day, to lean into the grace of
God, if we intend to be doers who act, and not hearers who forget.
It’s so much easier to forget, and carry on with our own agendas.
James says that
some in his community are like those who get up in the morning, look
in the mirror, and then two minutes later, return to take a second
look, because they’ve forgotten what they looked like two minutes ago.
It’s an image of the narcissist. He can’t see beyond himself, and
because he’s never sure about who he is, everything and everybody is
used to bolster his uncertain sense of self. I once had a 1 ½ lunch
with a new colleague who was welcoming me to Vancouver. At 6 p.m. that
very evening, we were at a meeting together. He came up to me,
extended his hand, and said, “I don’t believe we’ve met.” “Be not
hearers who forget”, exhorts James, “but doers who act”.
Hearers who forget are not changed by the gospel. Rather they
change the gospel to bolster their own image, and their own take on
reality. Their motto is “that’s my story and I’m sticking to it.”
Doers who act are those who listen to the strange wisdom of the gospel
message, wisdom which has the power to call into question the stories
we find ourselves “sticking to”, and which stick to us. Stories about
reality which are not gospel.
This is precisely
Jesus’ complaint in relation to some of his brothers in the faith.
They’re worried about Jesus’ disciples not washing their hands before
a meal, and thereby defiling themselves. Well that’s an
interesting tale to tell yourself about what sullies a soul, says
Jesus. Is this what contaminates a soul, dirt entering the body from
the outside? Is this how you set yourselves apart as a holy people?
Wash your hands? Hardly! It’s what gets inside the soul, at the level
of our beliefs that contaminate us. It’s the stories we tell ourselves
and our children about the meaning of life which seep in and possess
our soul for good or ill. And how do we know what story we’re
operating from, if it’s gospel or Empire, if it’s a story of love or
fear, if it’s a story of compassion or greed? How do we know if we’re
a hearer who forgets, or a doer who acts?
James offers a
rather succinct definition of purity in the religious life. “Religion
that is pure and undefiled before God is this: to care for the orphans
and widows in their distress, and to keep oneself unstained by the
world.” Now that cuts through grime like
a good laundry detergent, doesn’t it? It’s a definition that teases
out the gospel from the cultural narratives of Empire, of fear, and of
greed, masquerading as truth. These are the narratives that have the
power to stain our souls. Religion that is pure and undefiled asks a
simple question. Are we caring for the most vulnerable? Are we
developing social policy which “lifts the poor out of the dust, and
fills the hungry with good things?”
Being doers of the
word requires that we work from the inside out. It’s why we come back,
week after week, to church. We’re getting the story straight; change
what’s going on in our heart, and the outside manifests accordingly.
Because, let’s be honest, it’s so easy to forget. Nothing more
difficult in the religious life than getting the story straight,
because so many other stories compete for our allegiance. The truth is
that once we the gospel story into our hearts, the living Christ makes
a home there. And then we’ll know, once and for all, that it’s not
wealth accumulation, not empire building, not personal and national
security, not power. It’s about having the mind and the heart of
Christ, so that one day we can say with St. Paul, “not me, but Christ
in me.” |